Field data, not just lab scores
What real visitors experienced over the last 28 days, pulled from Google's own dataset, alongside the synthetic test.
Everyone nods along at “a few seconds slower”. Almost nobody has sat and watched it. These bars run on the real clock, so the slow one genuinely takes 6.2 seconds. Roughly what a bloated WordPress homepage does on 4G, and two and a half times Google’s threshold.
Two durations, not a case study. I am demonstrating six seconds, not claiming a particular client result. Your own numbers come from the £650 audit.
Google’s three Core Web Vitals, on real devices rather than a laptop on office wifi. Largest Contentful Paint for how long the main content takes to appear, Interaction to Next Paint for how quickly the page responds when someone taps, and Cumulative Layout Shift for whether things move under their thumb while it loads.
Then the boring causes underneath: image weight, render-blocking scripts, font loading, server response time, and how much of your JavaScript is running on pages that never use it. I test on a mid-range Android on a throttled connection, because that is what a lot of your visitors actually have.
What real visitors experienced over the last 28 days, pulled from Google's own dataset, alongside the synthetic test.
Ordered by time saved per hour of work. The first three items usually account for most of the gain.
Written so you can hand it to whoever maintains the site, including a developer who is not me.
You will find agencies advertising specific uplifts, along the lines of a fixed percentage more conversions for every tenth of a second saved. I am not going to quote you one. The correlation between speed and revenue is real and well documented at large scale, but nobody can honestly promise you a number for your particular site before looking at it. What I can promise is a measurable before and after on the vitals themselves, and I will show you both.
No, and chasing it wastes money. Passing the three Core Web Vitals on real visitor data is the goal. A site can score 100 in the lab and still feel slow to someone on a train.
Yes. I quote the fixes after the audit, so you are never paying for work before either of us knows what it involves. Plenty of clients take the report and do it themselves, which is fine.
Small ones, an afternoon. A theme that needs rebuilding, three or four weeks. The report tells you which situation you are in.
Shopify yes. Squarespace and Wix, partly. On closed platforms there is a ceiling to what anyone can change, and I will tell you where that ceiling is instead of billing you to hit it.
Real numbers from your device and connection, not a screenshot of a score I chose. Nothing is sent anywhere. The measurement happens in your browser and stays there. If one of these ever reads amber on my own site, you will see it, which is rather the point. I audit these for £650.